Isak Kept His Feet and Paid for It, Which Tells You Everything About VAR
There is a strange logic doing the rounds after Liverpool’s defeat to Arsenal at Anfield, and we think it needs calling out. The argument goes that Alexander Isak only has himself to blame for not getting a penalty, because he stayed on his feet when Jurrien Timber was hanging off his shirt. In our view that gets the whole thing backwards. The problem is officials who cannot spot a clear foul with every camera angle at their disposal.
Let us remind ourselves of the moment. Liverpool were trailing 1-0 in the first half when Conor Bradley whipped a ball into the box for Isak. As the Swede shaped to meet it, Timber grabbed a fistful of shirt and yanked. It knocked Isak off balance, the chance evaporated, and Andy Madley let the game run. Nobody at Stockley Park felt the need to step in either. Two layers of officiating, two misses.
The Panel Has Already Settled It
If anyone still doubts how clear-cut it was, the Premier League’s own Key Match Incidents panel has since concluded that Liverpool should have been awarded a spot kick and that VAR ought to have intervened. Pundits from across the spectrum came to the same view once they saw the replay. So the question was never really whether Isak should have made more of it. The question is why a system designed for exactly this kind of situation sat on its hands.
Read more: Angelo Stiller is the specialist anchor Liverpool keep failing to buy
Speaking while on international duty with Sweden, Isak gave the kind of honest answer we wish we heard more often. He accepted that on second viewing it looked like a penalty, but explained that in the heat of the moment he simply did not take in how much he was being held. He felt a tug, he said, just not one as strong as the footage later showed.
His explanation for why he did not go down was even simpler. His only thought was putting the ball in the net, and he pointed out that it is pretty difficult to attempt a finish and throw yourself to the floor at the same time. He was so focused on the goal, he said, that the pull barely registered.
Honesty Should Not Be a Handicap
We find that refreshing. Isak made it clear he sees no reason for players to exaggerate contact or dive deliberately. He conceded that with a sharper read of the situation he might have done more to make sure the referee noticed, but insisted that cheating your way to a decision should not be part of the job.
Then came the point that really matters. Isak suggested that it perhaps should not make much difference how a player reacts, because the whole reason VAR exists is to make the big calls in moments like this one. We could not agree more. If the technology only kicks in when a forward collapses theatrically, then all we have done is build an expensive machine that rewards play-acting.
Our Take
Liverpool did what they were meant to do. Bradley put the ball in the right place, Isak attacked it, and the officials had every tool they needed to get the call right. They did not. The result stands, but the episode should not be quietly filed away.
If anything, Isak comes out of this looking better than anyone else involved. He played it straight, he spoke about it sensibly, and he put the focus where it belongs. The people who should be answering questions are the ones in charge of the whistle and the monitor, not the striker who was simply trying to score.
More: Liverpool FC News →