No rush on Van Dijk’s future, and that’s probably the right call
Every so often a non-update becomes the update, and that is roughly what has happened with Virgil van Dijk’s contract situation. According to David Ornstein of The Athletic, there is currently no indication that formal renewal talks are underway, though he was careful to note that Liverpool have a habit of handling these conversations quietly, well away from public view.
That distinction matters. The absence of visible talks does not mean the club have ruled out a new deal, and the presence of some quiet contact behind the scenes would not necessarily mean anything has been agreed either. Supporters looking for certainty one way or the other are, for now, likely to be disappointed.
A pattern Liverpool have followed before
This will feel familiar to anyone who followed Van Dijk’s last renewal, which was not finalised until the spring of 2025. Ornstein pointed to that precedent directly, suggesting a similar timeline is plausible again this time around. If that holds, there is little reason to expect clarity before the turn of the year, let alone in the coming weeks.
Read more: Ngumoha is going nowhere, and the Bayern noise only strengthens his hand
There is a reasonable argument that this approach actually suits both parties. Liverpool get more information on how their captain is performing and what shape the squad needs heading into a new season, while Van Dijk continues to play his way into whatever conversation eventually takes place. Patience here is not the same as reluctance.
It also avoids a scenario Liverpool have faced with other long-serving players, where a public commitment is made too early and then looks awkward if form dips before the ink is even dry. Waiting until the picture is clearer protects both sides from a decision either might later regret.
Age and precedent complicate the picture
Van Dijk turns 36 next July, and that number alone invites caution from a club that has traditionally been wary of long commitments to players past 30. Exceptions have been made before, Van Dijk’s own existing deal being one of them, but each case tends to be judged on its own merits rather than on reputation alone.
Ornstein raised the possibility of an agreement that would run through the 2027-28 season, which would take the defender to a full decade at Anfield since his move from Southampton. It is a tidy milestone, the sort that appeals to both a boardroom and a fanbase, but a deal does not get done because the anniversary looks good on paper. It gets done if performance and terms line up.
Where this leaves things
Ornstein’s own assessment leaned positive on substance, if not on timing. He described Van Dijk as still playing well despite his age and suggested there was plenty left to offer, while stressing that any extension would be decided strictly on merit rather than sentiment. Given how central Van Dijk has been to Liverpool’s recent history, that is a reassuring signal even without a firm date attached to it.
For now, the honest conclusion is that nobody outside the building really knows how this resolves. The previous relationship between club and player offers a useful foundation if talks do develop, and the spring remains the most likely window for any real movement. Until then, this is a story that will keep generating headlines without actually changing very much.
What should reassure supporters is the tone rather than the timeline. Nothing in this update suggests Liverpool are cooling on their captain, and nothing suggests Van Dijk is angling for an exit. It simply means the conversation, whenever it happens, will take place on Liverpool’s usual terms: calm, private, and in no particular hurry.